Skip to content

Source Page Claim-Confidence Rewrite Audit

Why this audit happened

The initial source pages used Claim-Level Confidence to describe ingest reliability, for example whether a PDF was present, whether tags were detected, and whether biological claims still needed review. That was the wrong level for an LLM wiki: claim confidence should describe the strength and directness of knowledge claims from the source, not the status of the file-processing step.

Sources revisited

  • 121 ingested paper source pages in wiki/sources/
  • Mature reference style consulted from the parent CODEX_notebook/wiki/ source and entity pages
  • Local source text from private extracted text artifacts omitted from public export
  • Current topic, entity, digest, and project links used to rebuild Pages Updated From This Source

Page families changed

  • Source pages: rewritten from conservative file-processing scaffolds into provisional knowledge-oriented notes.
  • Source README: updated to describe source pages as knowledge notes derived from title, abstract/early extracted text, and tags.
  • Index and log: updated so navigation reflects the corrected source-page role.

Rule or interpretation changes

  • Claim-Level Confidence now refers to source-level knowledge claims: direct title/abstract claims, relevant biological cell/context claims, candidate regulatory mechanisms, and limits on extrapolation.
  • File-processing caveats now belong in Caveats, not in Claim-Level Confidence.
  • Key Findings now records extracted scientific statements from the title/abstract/early source text.
  • Pages Updated From This Source now reflects actual incoming links from topic, entity, digest, and project pages when present.
  • Automated tags remain provisional and are explicitly treated as possible over-calls.

Follow-up actions

  • Manually curate the highest-priority lung ILC2 and ILC3 papers to upgrade provisional source notes into mature source summaries.
  • Clean OCR/encoding artifacts in extracted abstracts when a source becomes a focus paper.
  • Replace broad automated context labels with manually verified species, tissue, assay, perturbation, and outcome details during focused review.

Rewritten source pages