Digest Claim Confidence Correction

Why this audit happened

The user identified that several digest pages still contained language about the local wiki, ingested files, source inventory, or manual-review workflow rather than focusing on biological knowledge claims. This audit records the correction of those digest pages so their confidence statements describe ILC biology, evidence strength, and disease-context boundaries.

Sources revisited

Page families changed

Digest pages: four existing digest pages were revised.
Digest confidence sections: each revised digest now includes an explicit Claim-level confidence boundaries section that defines high, medium-high, and medium confidence in biological/evidentiary terms.
Log page: the correction was recorded in the wiki log.
Index page: the correction audit was added to the wiki index.

Rule or interpretation changes

Digest Highest-confidence claims now describe reusable biological claims, not the existence or status of the local source library.
Scope language now describes the knowledge frame and evidence boundaries rather than the mechanics of ingestion or manual review.
Update triggers now describe future biological evidence that would change the model, not housekeeping tasks such as creating already-existing entity pages.
Caveats about local corpus scope remain only where they prevent overclaiming global trends; they are not used as confidence labels.

Follow-up actions

Apply the same review to topic pages if they show the same "document maintenance instead of knowledge claim" pattern.
When creating future digest pages, avoid confidence statements that mention file availability, source-page readiness, detected tags, or manual-review status.